Yıl 2017, Cilt 3, Sayı 9, Sayfalar 566 - 572 2017-12-25

IDENTIFYING STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 ARGAMAKMUR, NORTH BENGKULU

Mentari Darma Putri [1] , Dadi Rusdiana [2]

112 342

This is a preliminary study aimed to identify students’ scientific argumentation skill at Junior High School 1, Argamakmur, North Bengkulu. The data were gathered by online survey to 8 science teachers in Bengkulu and test to 32 students of grade eight in Junior High School 1, Argamakmur, North Bengkulu. Online survey consisted of 4 questions focused on science learning issues. The essay test to obtain scientific argumentation skill consisted of 4 questions, where each question was covering four indicators of scientific argumentation: claim, data, warrant and backing. A valid scientific argumentation test was adopted from Putri (2016). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics by calculating the percentage of average score of teacher answers and students’ scientific argumentation skill as a whole. The data analysis revealed that the teachers argue that students’ scientific argumentation skill was still very low compared to others skill like the science process skill, critical thinking skill, creative thinking skill, scientific literacy skill and student independence and this statement supported by test result where the score of students’ argumentation skill achieved low category. This phenomenon might be caused by the lack of educational learning process that facilitates students in expressing their opinions according to scientific evidence both orally and in writing. This paper also offers an idea helping teachers to improve students’ scientific argumentation skill by implementing phenomenon-based learning with video assistance through a modified "flipped classroom" approach.

Scientific Argumentation, Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skill
  • Bricker, L., & Bell, P. (2009). Conceptualizations of Argumentation from Science Studies and the Learning Sciences and their Implications for the Practices of Science Education. Science education, 92(3), 473-498. Christenson, N., Rundgren, S.N.C., & Hoglund, H.O. (2012). Using the See-Sep Model to Analyze Upper Secondary Students’ Use of Supporting Reason in Arguing Socioscientific Issues. Journal Science Education Technology, 21. p. 342-352. Defianti, Aprina. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Argumen menggunakan Multiple External Representations untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif dan Keterampilan Berargumentasi Siswa SMP. (Thesis). School of Postgraduate, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing The Norms Of Scientific Argumentation In Classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting And Promoting Argumentation Discourse In Science Education. Studies In Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). Enhancing The Quality Of Argumentation In School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. Golanics & Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Collaborative Discourse, Argumentation, And Learning: Preface And Literature Review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345-359. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing The Lesson” Or “Doing Science”: Argument In High School Genetics. Science Education,84(6), 757e792. Kelly, G. J., & Chen, C. (1999). The Sound Of Music: Constructing Science As A Sociocultural Practices Through Oral And Written Discourse. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 36(8), 883 – 915. Kulatunga, U., Moog, R. S. & Lewis, J.E. (2013). Argumentation and Participation Patterns in General Chemistry Peer-Led Sessions. Vol. 50. No. 10,pp. 1207-1231. United States of America: Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Newton, P. Driver, R. & Osborne, J. (1999). The Place Of Argumentation In The Pedagogy Of School Science. International Journal Of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576. Osman, Chuo Hiong, & Vebrianto. (2013). 21st Century Biology: An Interdisciplinary Approach of Biology, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 102 (2013) 188-194. Putri, Rahmah Evita. (2016). Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP Kelas VII Melalui Bahan Ajar IPA Terpadu dengan Tema Halo pada Topik Kalor. (Thesis). School of Postgraduate, Indonesia University of Education, Bandung. Rustaman, N. (1996). Peranan Praktikum dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. Training and Technician Training Papers FPMIPA IKIP Bandung. Sampson & Gerbino. (2010). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, 95, page 217-257. Simon, S. (2008). Using Toulmin's Argument Pattern In The Evaluation Of Argumentation In School Science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 31(3), 277e289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17437270802417176. Venville, G.J., & Dawson, V.M. (2010a). The Impact of Classroom Intervention on Grade 10 Students’ Argumentation Skills, Informal Reasoning, and Conceptual Understanding of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47. (8), p. 952-977. Venville, G.J., & Dawson, V.M. (2010b). Teaching Strategies for Developing Student’s Argumentation Skills About Sosio-Scientific Issues in High School Genetics. Research in Science Education, vol.42, p. 133-148. Yamin, Martinis. (2008). Desain Pembelajaran Berbasis Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.
Konular Sosyal
Dergi Bölümü Makaleler
Yazarlar

Yazar: Mentari Darma Putri (Sorumlu Yazar)
Ülke: Indonesia


Yazar: Dadi Rusdiana
Ülke: Indonesia


Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { ijaedu370424, journal = {International E-Journal of Advances in Education}, issn = {}, eissn = {2411-1821}, address = {OCERINT International Organization Center of Academic Research}, year = {2017}, volume = {3}, pages = {566 - 572}, doi = {10.18768/ijaedu.370424}, title = {IDENTIFYING STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 ARGAMAKMUR, NORTH BENGKULU}, key = {cite}, author = {Putri, Mentari Darma and Rusdiana, Dadi} }
APA Putri, M , Rusdiana, D . (2017). IDENTIFYING STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 ARGAMAKMUR, NORTH BENGKULU. International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3 (9), 566-572. DOI: 10.18768/ijaedu.370424
MLA Putri, M , Rusdiana, D . "IDENTIFYING STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 ARGAMAKMUR, NORTH BENGKULU". International E-Journal of Advances in Education 3 (2017): 566-572 <http://ijaedu.ocerintjournals.org/issue/33256/370424>
Chicago Putri, M , Rusdiana, D . "IDENTIFYING STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 ARGAMAKMUR, NORTH BENGKULU". International E-Journal of Advances in Education 3 (2017): 566-572
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - IDENTIFYING STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 ARGAMAKMUR, NORTH BENGKULU AU - Mentari Darma Putri , Dadi Rusdiana Y1 - 2017 PY - 2017 N1 - doi: 10.18768/ijaedu.370424 DO - 10.18768/ijaedu.370424 T2 - International E-Journal of Advances in Education JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 566 EP - 572 VL - 3 IS - 9 SN - -2411-1821 M3 - doi: 10.18768/ijaedu.370424 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370424 Y2 - 2017 ER -
EndNote %0 International E-Journal of Advances in Education IDENTIFYING STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 ARGAMAKMUR, NORTH BENGKULU %A Mentari Darma Putri , Dadi Rusdiana %T IDENTIFYING STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 ARGAMAKMUR, NORTH BENGKULU %D 2017 %J International E-Journal of Advances in Education %P -2411-1821 %V 3 %N 9 %R doi: 10.18768/ijaedu.370424 %U 10.18768/ijaedu.370424
ISNAD Putri, Mentari Darma , Rusdiana, Dadi . "IDENTIFYING STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILL AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1 ARGAMAKMUR, NORTH BENGKULU". International E-Journal of Advances in Education 3 / 9 (Aralık 2017): 566-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.370424