Yıl 2017, Cilt 3 , Sayı 9, Sayfalar 677 - 688 2017-12-27


Muhammad Safdar BHATTİ [1] , Zahida JABEEN [2] , Rafia MUKHTAR [3] , Muhammad BİLAL [4]

Textbooks play a fundamental function in educational programs and language classrooms around the globe. They are extremely accessible and useful resources that teachers and students can exploit according to their requirements. The intention of this study is to investigate the significance and effectiveness of B.Sc English textbook which is taught in the affiliated colleges of The IUB from the teachers and students perspectives. The assessment of the English textbook was conducted on the foundation of five criteria: The collection and association of contents in the textbook, price of the textbook, four skills, grammar and vocabulary, mechanism of the textbook. The study was conducted at three Govt. Colleges of Bahawalpur. Quantitative information was obtained through a questionnaire administered to 200 students and 20 teachers. Percentages, frequencies, standard deviations and mean were calculated for every item to explain on the whole depiction of how the students and teachers rated the textbook in conditions of five criteria. The outcomes revealed that both the students and the teachers felt negative about the majority of the items of the textbook. It was established that both grammar and vocabulary did not fulfill the students' needs. Majority of the teachers and the students mentioned that the textbook material failed to enhance the four language skills. It also indicated that there were no exercises and activities included in the textbook. Most of the students and all the teachers declared that textbook was not up to the level of the students.

Investigating, perspectives, textbook, revealed, enhance
  • Acklam, R. (1994). The role of coursebook. Practical English Teaching, 14(3), 12-14. Aftab, A. (2011). English language textbooks evaluation in Pakistan. University of Birmingham. Alderson, J. C. (1992). “Guidelines for the evaluation of language education.” In Alderon, J.C. and Beretla, A. (Eds.), Evaluating Second Language Education” Cambridge, UK: CUP. 274.304. Ansary. H. and Babi, E. (2002). “Universal Charastrictics of Evaluation”. The Internet TESL Journal 8/2. (March 9, 2003). Available: http:// itesIj.org/Articles/Ansary-Textbook/. Ashraf, H. (2006) :The Official Language of Pakistan” in A study of English Language Learning as an Element Affecting the Social Capital of the people of Pakistan [online], pp 90-114. Avilable from: http://prr.hec.gov.pk/Chapter/2423-6.pdf [Accessed February 25th, 2011] Awasthi, R.J., (2006). Textbook and its evaluation. Journal of NELTA, 11(1-2), 1-10. Banks, James. A. & Ambrose. A. Clegg, Jr. 1977. Teaching Strategies for the Social Studies: Inquiry, Valuating, and Decision Making. Massachusetts: Adison: Wesley Publishing Company. Bell, M.(1982). “Guidelines for the Evaluation of TAFE Programs Technical and Further Education Services.” Austraila. Bitterlin, Gretchen. (2003). TESOL Standards for Adult Education ESL Programs. TESOL: Alexandria, Virginia. Brown, J. D. and Rodgers, T. S. (2002) Doing Second Language Research. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press. Cohen, L. and Manoin, L. (1889) Research Methods in Education. 3rd ed London: Routledge. Cook, V. (2001) Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. 3rd ed. London: Arnold. Cortazzi, M. & Jin, L. (1999). Cultural Mirrors, Materials and methods in the EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), culturevin Second Language Teaching and Learning. Cambridge Univeristy Press: USA. Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebooks. Oxford : Maxmillian Heienman ELT. D. J. Short (2006). Content Teaching and Learning and Language. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics (Second Edition). p 101-105. Dornyei, Z. (2007) Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press. Dubin, F. & Olhstain, E.(1994). Course design : developing programs and materials for language learning. Cambridge : Cambridge Univeristy Press. Ebal, Robert L. and Frisable, David A. (1986). Essential of educational measurement. New Delhi, Prentice-Hall. Ebel. R.L., (1979). Measuring Educational Achievement, 3rd.ed, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Ena, O.T. (2013).Visual analysis of e-textbooks for senior high school in Indonesia. Unpublished EdH dissertation. Chicago : Loyola University. Feez, S. & Joyce, H. (2002). Text-based syllabus design. NSW : AMES. Garinger, D. (2001). Textbook evaluation. TEFL Web Journal. Gay L.R. (1985). Educational Evaluation and Measurement Columus Charles E. Merril Publishing Co. Genesee, F. (2001). Evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press. http:// dx. Doi.org/10.1017/ CBO 9780511667206.022. Ghani, M. (2003). “Language Learning Strategies Employed by L2 Learners”. Journal of Research (Faculty of Languages & Islamic Studies). Graves, K. (2003). Coursebooks. In Nunan, D. Practical English language teaching. New York: McGraw Hill Inc. Graves. K. (2000). Desiging Language Course. Heinle & Heinle publishers. Gronlund, N.E. (1985). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching, 5th ed. Macmillian Publishing Company. New York. Gu, P. Y. (2003). Vocabulary Learning in Second Language: Person, Task, Context and Strategies. TESL-EJ [online], 7 (2): A-4. Available from: http://test-ej.org/ej26/a4.html [Accessed May 24th, 2010]. Harmer, J. (2001). ThePractice of English Language Teaching. Essex : Longman. Hutchinson, T. & Torres, E., (1994). The textbook as an agent . ELT Journal, 48(4), 315-28. Hutchinson, T., & Torres, E. (1994). Textbook as an agent of chang. ELT Journal, 43 (4), 315-328. Hutchinson, Tom & Torres, Eunice. (1994). The textbook as agent of change. ELT Journal Volume 48/4 October 1994 : 315-328. Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. London : Pearson Education. Iwai, Y. (2010). Revisioning Reading Comprehension for English Language Learners. The Internet TESL Journal [online], XVI (4). Available from: http://itesIj.org/Articles/Iwai-Reading.html [Accessed June 5th, 2010]. Lathif, M. (2015). An Evaluation of English textbook for the Eighth Grades of Junior High School. Faculty of languages and arts Yogyakarta State University. Litz. D. (2001). Textbook Evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean Case Study. [online] UAE Univeristy of AL Amin. Available: http:// www.asian-efl-journa.com/Litz thesis. pdf. Mackey, A. and Gass, S. M. (2005) Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. Mariani, Chales. F. (1980). “Course Maintenance: The problem and Solution”.Educational Technology. Vol. XX, No. 12. Masuhara, H. (1998). What do teachers really want from textbook? In Tomlinson, B. Materials development for language teaching. Cambridge : Cambridge Univeristy Press. McCormick, R. and James, M. Clift, P. (2006). “Curriculum Evaluation in Schools”. London: Routeleg. Metha, N. K. (2009). Vocabulary Teaching: Effective Methodologies. The Internet TESL Journal [online], XV (3). Available from: http://itesIj.org/Techniques/Metha-Vocabulary.html [Accessed June 5th , 2010]. Minh, N.T.T. (2007). Textbook evaluation: The case of English textbooks currently in use in Vietnam’s upper secondary schools. College of Foreign Languages Vietnam National University Hanoi. Morley, Joan. (1979). Material Development: The New Frontier Not by chance But by Design on TESOL 79: 12-24. Mukundan, J., Nimehchisalem, V, & Hajimohammadi, R. (2011). Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist : A focus group discussion. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1 (12), 100-106. Murphy, D.F. (1985). “Evaluation in language teaching assessment accountability and awareness. Naseem, S., Shah, S.K. & Tabassum, S. (2015). Evaluation of English textbook in Pakistan: A case study of Punjab textbook for 9th class. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies Vol.3, No.3, pp.24-42. Nayyar, A. H. & Salim, A. (2007). The Subtle Subversion: the State of Curricula and Textbooks in Pakistan. Nguyen, C.T (2015). An evaluation of the textbook English:6 A case study from secondary schools in the Mekong Delta Provinces of Vietnam. Nunan, D. (1992) Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press. O’Neil, R. (1993). Are textbooks of a disease? Practical English Teaching, 14/1, 12-14. Parrish, Betsy (2004). Teaching Adult ESL A Practical Introduction. McGraw Hill: New York, NY. Rajadurai J. (2005). Revisiting the Concentric Circles: Conceptual and Sociolinguistic Considerations. Asian TEFL Journal [online], VII (4). Avilable from: http:// www.asian-efl – journal.com/December-05-jr.php[Accessed January 26th, 2011]. Richards, J.C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cmbridge Univeristy Press. Riddell, D. (2003). Teaching English as a forein language. New York : Teach Yourself. Robinson, M. (1991). “ESP Today: a practitioner’s guide.” New York: Prentice-Hall. Wen CWH, Chein L and Chung LC (2011). Thinking of the textbook in the esl/efl classroom. English Laguage Teaching 4(2) 91-96. Wiersma, William and Jurs, G. (1990). Educational Measurement and Testing London, allyn and Bscon.
Bölüm Makaleler

Yazar: Muhammad Safdar BHATTİ (Sorumlu Yazar)
Ülke: Pakistan

Yazar: Zahida JABEEN
Ülke: Pakistan

Yazar: Rafia MUKHTAR
Ülke: Pakistan

Yazar: Muhammad BİLAL
Ülke: Pakistan


Yayımlanma Tarihi : 27 Aralık 2017

EndNote %0 International E-Journal of Advances in Education INVESTIGATING THE PERSPECTIVES OF TEACHERS AND STUDENTS ABOUT B.SC ENGLISH TEXTBOOK: A CASE STUDY %A Muhammad Safdar Bhatti , Zahida Jabeen , Rafia Mukhtar , Muhammad Bilal %T INVESTIGATING THE PERSPECTIVES OF TEACHERS AND STUDENTS ABOUT B.SC ENGLISH TEXTBOOK: A CASE STUDY %D 2017 %J IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education %P 2411-1821-2411-1821 %V 3 %N 9 %R doi: 10.18768/ijaedu.372120 %U 10.18768/ijaedu.372120