Abstract
The needs of the working life and the competences required there are under a change, and educational institutions should be able to answer for this need by providing their students with competences needed. This usually requires changes in their own activities as well. The implementation of the change is often problematic even if the tools and methods how to conduct changes were familiar, because the change requires learning both on individual and organizational level, guiding of learning, internal training, and good command of communication and interaction. In this article we will discuss how to make the change – how to develop educational organizations with innovation pedagogy through the process consultation method. Innovation pedagogy is a learning approach focused on the development of innovation competences, defining how knowledge is assimilated, produced and used in a manner that can create innovations. Innovation pedagogy answers for the development needs of most educational organizations, but it is a challenging process to adapt and establish it and it requires that a change process is to be conducted in the organization. Process consultation is a development method for a work community where the personnel participates into the development of their own work, work processes and work community. Process consultation is maybe one of the most workable tools in the development of an expert organization in order to accomplish a real impact and change.
Educational organizations have an emerging need to answer for the demands of the changing world and working life, and innovation pedagogy, originating from the working life needs, answers directly for this demand. Organizations can be changed only ‘from the inside’ by involving the personnel into the implementation of the change, and therefore process consultation can be the tool for accomplishing the change. This article aims to provide new kind of methodological knowledge and tools, which have not earlier been studied and applied in this context. The process consulting methods can provide added value to develop pedagogical knowhow in educational organizations and thus support their internal learning and development. The theoretical framework of the article is put into practice in the description of a real empirical case. The focus in this article will be in higher educational organizations, but the approach is applicable for all level of educational institutions. The managerial outcome of the paper is that in the development of an educational organization process consultation can be most powerful tool in order to conduct a real change and impact.
Keywords: Educational organizations, innovation pedagogy, innovation competence, process consultation, change
References
- Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P. & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
- Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., Minkov M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Honkanen H. (2006). Muutoksen agentit. Helsinki: Edita.
- Kairisto-Mertanen, L., Penttilä, T., Putkonen, A. (2010). Embedding innovation skills in learning. In Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Universities (ed. Neuvonen-Rauhala M-L). Series C Articles, reports and other current publications, part 72. Lahti University of Applied Sciences.
- Kurpius D. J., Fuqua D. R., Rozecki T. (1993). The Consulting Process: A Multidimensional Approach. In Journal of Counselling and Development July-August 1993, Volume 71, pp. 601-606.
- Kykyri V-L. (2008). Helping Clients to help themselves. A Discursive Perspective to Process Consulting Practices in Multi-party Settings. Academic Dissertation. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
- Nonaka I. & Takeuchi H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Nowotny, H., Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the public in an age of Uncertainty. London: Polity Press.
- Nowotny, H. & Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2003). ‘Mode 2´ Revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva 41(3) pp.179–194.
- Penttilä T. (2014). Innovation pedagogy – Pedagogia de Innovación. Presentation at III Peruvian-Nordic Education Forum. Lima, Peru, 21.10.2014
- Penttilä, T., Kairisto-Mertanen, L. & Putkonen, A. (2011a). Communicational Aspects of Innovation Pedagogy and Stakeholder Dialogue. In Towards Innovation pedagogy – A new approach to teaching and learning in universities of applied sciences (eds. A. Lehto, L. Kairisto-Mertanen & T. Penttilä) Reports from Turku University of Applied Sciences. 100, pp. 65-77. Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences.
- Penttilä T. – Kairisto-Mertanen L. – Putkonen A. (2011b). Innovation pedagogical approach – strategic viewpoints. Proceedings of International Conference of Technology, Education and Development (INTED2011)
- Penttilä T. - Kairisto-Mertanen L. -Putkonen A. – Lehto A. (2013). Innovation Pedagogy – A Strategic Learning Approach for the Future. In Lehto A. –Penttilä T. (eds.) Pedagogical views on innovation competences and entrepreneurship, pp.11-23. Reports from Turku University of Applied Sciences 171. Tampere 2013.
- Schein E. H. (2001). Yrityskulttuuri. Selviytymisopas. Helsinki: Suomen Laatukeskus Koulutuspalvelut Oy.
- Schein E. H. (1999). Process consultation Revised. Reading: Addison –Wesley.
- Schein E. H. (1987). Process consultation. Volume II. USA: Addison-Wesley.
- Schein E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Teivonen T. (2008). Työnohjaajan ja prosessikonsultin roolit. In ’Työnohjaus – mitä, missä, milloin?’, ed. Keskinen S. pp. 153-178. Täydennyskoulutuskeskuksen julkaisuja B 23.
- Valpola A. (2011). Muutoksen johtaminen. Opetusalan johtamisen foorumi 10.6.2011. www.oph.fi/download/133176_Valpola_Anneli.pd
Abstract
References
- Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P. & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
- Hofstede G., Hofstede G. J., Minkov M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Honkanen H. (2006). Muutoksen agentit. Helsinki: Edita.
- Kairisto-Mertanen, L., Penttilä, T., Putkonen, A. (2010). Embedding innovation skills in learning. In Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Universities (ed. Neuvonen-Rauhala M-L). Series C Articles, reports and other current publications, part 72. Lahti University of Applied Sciences.
- Kurpius D. J., Fuqua D. R., Rozecki T. (1993). The Consulting Process: A Multidimensional Approach. In Journal of Counselling and Development July-August 1993, Volume 71, pp. 601-606.
- Kykyri V-L. (2008). Helping Clients to help themselves. A Discursive Perspective to Process Consulting Practices in Multi-party Settings. Academic Dissertation. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
- Nonaka I. & Takeuchi H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Nowotny, H., Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science. Knowledge and the public in an age of Uncertainty. London: Polity Press.
- Nowotny, H. & Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2003). ‘Mode 2´ Revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva 41(3) pp.179–194.
- Penttilä T. (2014). Innovation pedagogy – Pedagogia de Innovación. Presentation at III Peruvian-Nordic Education Forum. Lima, Peru, 21.10.2014
- Penttilä, T., Kairisto-Mertanen, L. & Putkonen, A. (2011a). Communicational Aspects of Innovation Pedagogy and Stakeholder Dialogue. In Towards Innovation pedagogy – A new approach to teaching and learning in universities of applied sciences (eds. A. Lehto, L. Kairisto-Mertanen & T. Penttilä) Reports from Turku University of Applied Sciences. 100, pp. 65-77. Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences.
- Penttilä T. – Kairisto-Mertanen L. – Putkonen A. (2011b). Innovation pedagogical approach – strategic viewpoints. Proceedings of International Conference of Technology, Education and Development (INTED2011)
- Penttilä T. - Kairisto-Mertanen L. -Putkonen A. – Lehto A. (2013). Innovation Pedagogy – A Strategic Learning Approach for the Future. In Lehto A. –Penttilä T. (eds.) Pedagogical views on innovation competences and entrepreneurship, pp.11-23. Reports from Turku University of Applied Sciences 171. Tampere 2013.
- Schein E. H. (2001). Yrityskulttuuri. Selviytymisopas. Helsinki: Suomen Laatukeskus Koulutuspalvelut Oy.
- Schein E. H. (1999). Process consultation Revised. Reading: Addison –Wesley.
- Schein E. H. (1987). Process consultation. Volume II. USA: Addison-Wesley.
- Schein E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Teivonen T. (2008). Työnohjaajan ja prosessikonsultin roolit. In ’Työnohjaus – mitä, missä, milloin?’, ed. Keskinen S. pp. 153-178. Täydennyskoulutuskeskuksen julkaisuja B 23.
- Valpola A. (2011). Muutoksen johtaminen. Opetusalan johtamisen foorumi 10.6.2011. www.oph.fi/download/133176_Valpola_Anneli.pd
Details
| Journal Section | Articles |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 26, 2016 |
| Submission Date | August 22, 2016 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2016 |
Cited By
Innovative teaching strategies: A principal component analysis
Corporate and Business Strategy Review
https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv5i1art9
Sustainable Innovation in Higher Education: The Impact of Gender on Innovation Competences
Sustainability
Raquel Ferreras-Garcia
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095004
Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015 - 2023
Contact: ijaedujournal@hotmail.com
International E-Journal of Advances in Education by IJAEDU is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://ijaedu.ocerintjournals.org