THE MALAYSIAN SECONDARY SCHOOL EFL SPEAKING CURRICULUM: A THEORETICAL FOUNDATION ALIGNMENT ANALYSIS
Abstract
Goal–achieving curricular are often coherent at their fundamental level. In order for a curriculum to achieve its goals, it is imperative that the curriculum is coherent at all levels. The contents presented in a curriculum must align with its theoretical underpinning. The present Malaysian English language curriculum is developed and designed based on the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). Thus, the purpose of the current study was to examine if the theoretical grounding of the Malaysian form five English language curriculum, in particular the speaking curriculum, is in alignment with its communicative label. In line with its label, the speaking curriculum embedded in the Malaysian form five English language curriculum should be developed and designed based on the CLT. It should reflect the CLT approach. The data for this study were collected from the Form Five English Language Curriculum Specifications document and the Form Five English Language textbook. In analyzing the alignment of the Malaysian form five English language speaking curriculum with the communicative approach, the data were categorized under major second language acquisition (SLA) theories and second language (L2) speaking theories. The findings show that the socio-cognitive and socio-cultural theories are highly reflected in the Malaysian form five English Language speaking curriculum, the two theories which are closely related to the communicative approach. This shows that the Malaysian form five English language speaking curriculum is primarily in alignment with its communicative label. The findings are discussed in relation to their implications on English as a foreign language (EFL) speaking instruction.
Keywords
References
- Abdul Aziz, N. H. (2007). ESL students’ perspectives on language anxiety. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia: Serdang.
- Abdullah. H & Sidek, H.M. (2012). L2 writing feedback: Alignment of instructional planning and implementation. Journal of Language Studies, 15, 15-17.
- A. Rahman, N. H. (2014). From curriculum reform to classroom practice: An evaluation of the English primary curriculum in Malaysia. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of York.
- Anthony, E. (1963). Approach, method, and technique. English Language Teaching, 17(2), 63-67.
- Ashman, A., & Gillies, R. (Eds.). (2003). Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups. Routledge.
- Baharun, H., Sidek, H.M., M.M. Idrus, N.S.M. Saad, (2016). Task-Based Language Learning: Investigating the Dynamic of Learners’ Oral Interaction. International E-journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 2(5), 570-580.
- Basturkmen, H. L. (1999). A content analysis of ELT textbook blurbs: Reflections of theory in use. RELC, 30(18), 20-38.
- Brandl, K. (2007). Principles of communicative language teaching and task-based instruction. Communicative language teaching in action: Putting principles to work, 1-38.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Hazleena Baharun
Harison Mohd Sidek
Noor Saazai Mat Saad
Mohd Muzhafar Mohd Idrus
Haliza Harun
Ramiaida Darmi
Norhana Abdullah
Zarina Ashikin Zakaria
Publication Date
December 9, 2016
Submission Date
January 25, 2017
Acceptance Date
January 16, 2017
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 2 Number: 6
