THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE E-LEARNING FROM THE PERSPECTIVES OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS ON THE ACCEPTANCE, ACCESSIBILITY AND COST SAVINGS
Öz
The evolution and the internationalization of education system, has made the learning process easier and flexible. Over the past few years, E-Learning has evolved with demand from an increasing number of countries that transform the academic policy in order to produce highly educated community. Electronic learning (E-Learning) is learning utilizing electronic technologies to access educational curriculum outside of a traditional classroom. In most cases it refers to a course or program or degree delivered completely online. To be competitive and cost efficient, higher learning institutions are struggling to adapt an E-Learning approach. As such E-Learning has struggled to find acceptance in academic circles. Thus, this study aims to explore the effectiveness of E-Learning from three variables which are acceptance, accessibility and the cost savings. This study recruited 315 university students through random sampling. Data were collected through survey. The respondents were asked for consent before proceeding to the survey in order to ensure that ethical consideration was taken into account during conducting the study. Data were analysed using statistical package of social sciences (SPSS) and various statistical techniques were used such as descriptive analysis and regression analysis. Results indicate that there was a significant relationship between acceptance and the effectiveness of E-Learning, while it was different for the accessibility and cost savings. The result also found that acceptance is an important factor that contributes to the effectiveness of E-Learning with a value of β = 0.982. In conclusion, it is time to improve the E-Learning system through access to mobiles and moving towards a new educational paradigm called ‘M-Learning’.
Keywords: E-learning, acceptance, accessibility, cost saving, effectiveness
Anahtar Kelimeler
E-learning acceptance accessibility cost saving effectiveness
Kaynakça
- Arsham, H. (1995). Interactive Education: Impact of the Internet on Learning & Teaching. http://home.ubalt.edu/ntsbarsh/interactive.htm
- Chai Lee Goi & Poh Yen Ng.(2009). E-learning in Malaysia: Success Factors in Implementing E-learning Program. Paper presented at International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 20(2), pp 237-246.
- Chan Y. F., Ranjit K.S., Jamiah Baba & Eliza Parman. (2007). Computer Education for Classroom Teaching. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill
- Dillon, A., & Morris, M. G. (1996). User acceptance of information technology: Theories and models. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31, 3-32
- Eom,L. (2006).
- Fichten, C. S. Ferraro, V. Asuncion, J. V. Chwojka, C. Barile, M. Nguyen, M. N. Klomp, R. & Wolforth, J. (2009). Disabilities and e-Learning Problems and Solutions: An Exploratory Study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 241-256. http://www.adaptech.org/cfichten/abDisabilitiesAndE-LearningProblems.pdf
- Guglielman, E. (2010). E-Learning and Disability: Accessibility as a contributor to inclusion. Fifth Doctoral Consortium at the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Barcelona, Spain, 29 September, 31-36
- Halawi, L.A., Mccarthy, R.V & Pires, S. (2009) An Evaluation of E-learning on the Basis of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Education for Business, 84 (6), 374-380.
- Hussein, Z. (2015). Explicating students’ behaviours of E-learning: A viewpoint of the extended technology acceptance. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 1 (10), pp 68-73.
- Hjeltnes,T.A. & Hansson,B.(2005). Cost effectiveness and cost efficiency in E-Learning.QUIS
- Hong, K.S., Lai, K.W., & Holton, D. (2003). Students' satisfaction and perceived learning with a Webbased course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 6(1). Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_1_2003/v_1_2003.html.
- Khalid, N. (2014). The Role of Perceived Usefulness And Perceived Enjoyment In Assessing Students’ Intention To Use Lms Using 3-Tum. Global Summit on Education GSE 2014 (E-ISBN 978-11768-5-6)
- Konur, O. (2007) Computer assisted teaching and assessment of disabled students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23,207-21
- Lin, J.C.-C., Lu, H., 2000. Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a Web Site. International Journal of Information Management 20, 197–208.
- Sangra, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an Inclusive Definition of E-Learning: An Approach to the Conceptual Framework.The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.
- Song, S.M. (2010). E-learning: Investigating students' acceptance of online learning in hospitality programs. Masters’ Thesis.
- Ssegawa, A. (2015). An analysis of accessibility of e-Learning Systems in the context of Higher Education in Uganda (2015-2016)
- Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, W., Tam, K. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 215– 242
- Waddell, C. D. (2007). Accessible electronic & information technology: Legal obligations of higher education and Section 508. ATHEN e-Journal, 2, retrieved May 3, 2009, from http://athenpro.org/node/54.
- Woodall, L,C. (2011). “Transitioning to Online Education in the Caribbean: The UWI Open Campus.” University of Toronto: Ph.D. dissertation.
- https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/29938/1/Woodall_Lora_C_20117_PhD_thesis.pdf
Öz
Kaynakça
- Arsham, H. (1995). Interactive Education: Impact of the Internet on Learning & Teaching. http://home.ubalt.edu/ntsbarsh/interactive.htm
- Chai Lee Goi & Poh Yen Ng.(2009). E-learning in Malaysia: Success Factors in Implementing E-learning Program. Paper presented at International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 20(2), pp 237-246.
- Chan Y. F., Ranjit K.S., Jamiah Baba & Eliza Parman. (2007). Computer Education for Classroom Teaching. Malaysia: McGraw-Hill
- Dillon, A., & Morris, M. G. (1996). User acceptance of information technology: Theories and models. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31, 3-32
- Eom,L. (2006).
- Fichten, C. S. Ferraro, V. Asuncion, J. V. Chwojka, C. Barile, M. Nguyen, M. N. Klomp, R. & Wolforth, J. (2009). Disabilities and e-Learning Problems and Solutions: An Exploratory Study. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 241-256. http://www.adaptech.org/cfichten/abDisabilitiesAndE-LearningProblems.pdf
- Guglielman, E. (2010). E-Learning and Disability: Accessibility as a contributor to inclusion. Fifth Doctoral Consortium at the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Barcelona, Spain, 29 September, 31-36
- Halawi, L.A., Mccarthy, R.V & Pires, S. (2009) An Evaluation of E-learning on the Basis of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Education for Business, 84 (6), 374-380.
- Hussein, Z. (2015). Explicating students’ behaviours of E-learning: A viewpoint of the extended technology acceptance. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 1 (10), pp 68-73.
- Hjeltnes,T.A. & Hansson,B.(2005). Cost effectiveness and cost efficiency in E-Learning.QUIS
- Hong, K.S., Lai, K.W., & Holton, D. (2003). Students' satisfaction and perceived learning with a Webbased course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 6(1). Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_1_2003/v_1_2003.html.
- Khalid, N. (2014). The Role of Perceived Usefulness And Perceived Enjoyment In Assessing Students’ Intention To Use Lms Using 3-Tum. Global Summit on Education GSE 2014 (E-ISBN 978-11768-5-6)
- Konur, O. (2007) Computer assisted teaching and assessment of disabled students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23,207-21
- Lin, J.C.-C., Lu, H., 2000. Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a Web Site. International Journal of Information Management 20, 197–208.
- Sangra, A., Vlachopoulos, D., & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an Inclusive Definition of E-Learning: An Approach to the Conceptual Framework.The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.
- Song, S.M. (2010). E-learning: Investigating students' acceptance of online learning in hospitality programs. Masters’ Thesis.
- Ssegawa, A. (2015). An analysis of accessibility of e-Learning Systems in the context of Higher Education in Uganda (2015-2016)
- Thong, J. Y. L., Hong, W., Tam, K. (2002). Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 215– 242
- Waddell, C. D. (2007). Accessible electronic & information technology: Legal obligations of higher education and Section 508. ATHEN e-Journal, 2, retrieved May 3, 2009, from http://athenpro.org/node/54.
- Woodall, L,C. (2011). “Transitioning to Online Education in the Caribbean: The UWI Open Campus.” University of Toronto: Ph.D. dissertation.
- https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/29938/1/Woodall_Lora_C_20117_PhD_thesis.pdf
Ayrıntılar
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
|---|---|
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 26 Ağustos 2016 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 22 Ağustos 2016 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2016Cilt: 2 Sayı: 5 |
Cited By
Educating the next generation of radiologists: a comparative report of ChatGPT and e-learning resources
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2023.232496
Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015 - 2023
Contact: ijaedujournal@hotmail.com
International E-Journal of Advances in Education by IJAEDU is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://ijaedu.ocerintjournals.org