Araştırma Makalesi
PDF Zotero Mendeley EndNote BibTex Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2019, Cilt 5, Sayı 15, 361 - 369, 07.01.2020
https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.593884

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P. et al (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon. Assaly, I. R., & Smadi, O. M. (2015, April 23). Using Bloom's Taxonomy to Evaluate the Cognitive Levels of Master Class Textbook's Questions. Retrieved April 30, 2017, from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/ Barahal, S. (2008), Thinking about Thinking: Pre- Service Teachers Strengthen their Thinking Artfully, Phi Delta Kappan 90 (4). Britishcouncilorg. (2017). Britishcouncilorg. Retrieved3 June, 2017, from http://courses.britishcouncil.org/teachertraining/mod/glossary/print.php?id=4561 Elliott Seif. (2013). Edge, A professional networking community for educators. Retrieved 26 April, 2017, from http://edge.ascd.org/blogpost/strengthening-curriculum-and-instruction-in-a-21st-century-world. Imtliuse. (2017). Imtliuse. Retrieved 21 May, 2017, from https://www.imt.liu.se/edu/Bologna/LO/slo.pdf Ibrahim, F. (1998). Curricula foundations, organizations, and Evaluation. Cairo: Egypt Library. Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview [Electronic Version]. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. Liberty concepts. (2013). The Glossary of Education Reform. Retrieved 4 May, 2017, from http://edglossary.org/blooms-taxonomy/ Nazri Hassan et al... (2017). Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills Module in Science Primary School: Needs Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 624-628. Nitko, A. & Brookhart, S. (2007), Educational Assessment of Students, Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. Norris, S. & Ennis, R. (1989), Evaluating Critical Thinking, Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications. Partnership for 21st century learning, p21. (2002). P21org. Retrieved 24 April, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/component/content/article/140-history. Partnership for 21st century learning, p21. (2002). P21org. Retrieved 24 April, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/about-us/our-history. Partnership for 21st century learning, p21. (2002). P21org. Retrieved 23 April, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_Framework_Definitions_New_Logo_2015.pdf . Partnership for 21st century learning, (2002). P21org. Retrieved 24, April 2017, from http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework. Riazi, A., & Mosalanejad, N. (2010). Evaluation of learning objectives in Iranian High-School and pre-university English Textbooks using Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, vol. 13(4), 1-16. Sproutfundorg. (2016). the Sprout Fund. Retrieved 21 April, 2017, from http://www.sproutfund.org/2016/04/29/demystifying-learning-frameworks-the-p21 framework/. Textbookequityorg, M. (2017). Textbookequityorg. Retrieved 7 May, 2017, from https://textbookequity.org/Textbooks/Orey_Emergin_Perspectives_Learning.pdf Vanderbiltedu, P. (2017). Vanderbilt University. Retrieved 4 May, 2017, from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/

EVALUATING THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM OF COMPUTER SCIENCE GRADE 6 TO 8 BY USING BLOOM’S TAXONOMY

Yıl 2019, Cilt 5, Sayı 15, 361 - 369, 07.01.2020
https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.593884

Öz

Critical thinking, problem solving and logical reasoning are considered as the 21st century learning skills. These higher order thinking skills (HOTS) can only be developed through curriculum and teaching and learning strategies, because it  include critical, logical, reflective, metacognitive, and creative thinking.

The purpose of this study is to analyze National Curriculum 2006 (Pakistan) of Computer Education in order to observe that how much it is helpful for the development of higher order thinking skills among the students and whether it has focused on merging 21st century interdisciplinary themes with core contents of the subject.

The National Curriculum2006 (Pakistan) of Computer Education from grade VI to VIII was analyzed using the revised blooms taxonomy. Out of six levels, upper three levels Analyzing, Evaluating and Creating were considered as HOTS. Frequency and Proportions were calculated for Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) meeting HOTS criteria. P21 framework was used for checking the contents and SLOs which merging the 21st century interdisciplinary themes in curriculum.

Overall only 9% of the SLOs in curriculum met the requirement of HOTS. There was a slightly increasing trend was observed from grade 6 to 8. Grade 6 had 6%, grade 7 had 9% and grade 8 had 11% of HOTS.

However overall proportion of SLOs meeting HOTS was low but an increasing trend was observed from grade VI to grade VIII. In order to develop HOTS among the students, there is a need to redesign the curriculum, teachers should be trained accordingly and assessment standards should also be meeting with curriculum needs.

It will help in the re-designing of National Curriculum for Computer Education Grade VI-VIII. This study can be expended to analyze the National Curriculum for other subjects.

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., Airasian, P. et al (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon. Assaly, I. R., & Smadi, O. M. (2015, April 23). Using Bloom's Taxonomy to Evaluate the Cognitive Levels of Master Class Textbook's Questions. Retrieved April 30, 2017, from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/ Barahal, S. (2008), Thinking about Thinking: Pre- Service Teachers Strengthen their Thinking Artfully, Phi Delta Kappan 90 (4). Britishcouncilorg. (2017). Britishcouncilorg. Retrieved3 June, 2017, from http://courses.britishcouncil.org/teachertraining/mod/glossary/print.php?id=4561 Elliott Seif. (2013). Edge, A professional networking community for educators. Retrieved 26 April, 2017, from http://edge.ascd.org/blogpost/strengthening-curriculum-and-instruction-in-a-21st-century-world. Imtliuse. (2017). Imtliuse. Retrieved 21 May, 2017, from https://www.imt.liu.se/edu/Bologna/LO/slo.pdf Ibrahim, F. (1998). Curricula foundations, organizations, and Evaluation. Cairo: Egypt Library. Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview [Electronic Version]. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. Liberty concepts. (2013). The Glossary of Education Reform. Retrieved 4 May, 2017, from http://edglossary.org/blooms-taxonomy/ Nazri Hassan et al... (2017). Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills Module in Science Primary School: Needs Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 624-628. Nitko, A. & Brookhart, S. (2007), Educational Assessment of Students, Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. Norris, S. & Ennis, R. (1989), Evaluating Critical Thinking, Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications. Partnership for 21st century learning, p21. (2002). P21org. Retrieved 24 April, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/component/content/article/140-history. Partnership for 21st century learning, p21. (2002). P21org. Retrieved 24 April, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/about-us/our-history. Partnership for 21st century learning, p21. (2002). P21org. Retrieved 23 April, 2017, from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_Framework_Definitions_New_Logo_2015.pdf . Partnership for 21st century learning, (2002). P21org. Retrieved 24, April 2017, from http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework. Riazi, A., & Mosalanejad, N. (2010). Evaluation of learning objectives in Iranian High-School and pre-university English Textbooks using Bloom’s Taxonomy. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, vol. 13(4), 1-16. Sproutfundorg. (2016). the Sprout Fund. Retrieved 21 April, 2017, from http://www.sproutfund.org/2016/04/29/demystifying-learning-frameworks-the-p21 framework/. Textbookequityorg, M. (2017). Textbookequityorg. Retrieved 7 May, 2017, from https://textbookequity.org/Textbooks/Orey_Emergin_Perspectives_Learning.pdf Vanderbiltedu, P. (2017). Vanderbilt University. Retrieved 4 May, 2017, from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Nasreen SAHİTO
Pakistan

Yayımlanma Tarihi 7 Ocak 2020
Başvuru Tarihi 29 Ekim 2019
Kabul Tarihi 1 Ocak 2020
Yayınlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019, Cilt 5, Sayı 15

Kaynak Göster

EndNote %0 International E-Journal of Advances in Education EVALUATING THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM OF COMPUTER SCIENCE GRADE 6 TO 8 BY USING BLOOM’S TAXONOMY %A Nasreen Sahito %T EVALUATING THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM OF COMPUTER SCIENCE GRADE 6 TO 8 BY USING BLOOM’S TAXONOMY %D 2020 %J IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education %P 2411-1821-2411-1821 %V 5 %N 15 %R doi: 10.18768/ijaedu.593884 %U 10.18768/ijaedu.593884

                                                           Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015

                                                                              Contact: ijaedujournal@hotmail.com