Application of Neuro-Linguistic Programming Techniques to Enhance the Motivation of At-Risk Student

Sabariah Sharif; Emila Abdul Aziz

doi:10.18768/ijaedu.65269

Application of Neuro-Linguistic Programming Techniques to Enhance the Motivation of At-Risk Student

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 42 - 48, 18.04.2015

Sabariah Sharif Emila Abdul Aziz

https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.65269

Cited By: 3

Öz

Motivation is the trigger of an individual behavior to achieve an outcome. Despite motivation, there are values and beliefs that affected by the mind. By seeing the concept of mind as the controller of a person’s behavior, this study has been carried out using Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) as the intervention to increase the motivation of at-risk students in the prison. Intrinsic motivation in this study area consists of self-confidence, intention to change, interest to study and perspective to life after release from the jail. Pre and post experiment with qualitative approach by using interviews and observation to six students had been done. There are three main interventions from NLP that being used in this study that are Progressive Relaxation Technique, Discover Your True Values Technique and Circle of Excellence Technique. These three techniques had been carried out one by one and the data is related. All the data has been transcribed and analyzed to answer three main questions of this study. This study shows that application of NLP techniques increases the motivation of high risk students effectively. Overall, this study has been success to enhance the motivation among at-risk students in the prison and hopefully can be used to increase the quality of human resource produced through education.

Keywords: Neuro-Linguistic Programmings, at-risk student

Anahtar Kelimeler

Neuro-Linguistic Programmings, at-risk student

Kaynakça

Asmawati Desa. Psikologi Untuk Golongan Profesional. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., 2002
B. Badrulzaman, Persekitaran Keluarga dan Kesannya Terhadap Tingkah Laku Devian Remaja di Daerah Pontian, Johor. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Thesis Sarjana. B. 2006.
R.Bailey,.NLP Counselling. Great Britain: Speechmark Publishing Ltd. 2001
A. Bandura,. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. 1997
A. Bashir, A., & M. Ghani,. Effective Communication and Neurolinguistic Programming. Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci. Vol. 6 (1), 216-222. 2012
N. Brown. What makes a good educator? The relevance of meta programmes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(5), 515-533. 2004
J. Carey, R. Churches, R., G. Hutchinson, G., T. Jones, J., P. Tosey, Neuro-linguistic programming and learning: teacher case studies on the impact of NLP in education. United Kingdom: CfBT Education Trust, dibentangkan dalam Education Show Seminar, 6 Mac 2010. 2010
Y.P. Chua, . Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan: Buku 1. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill. S.L. Kim and D. Ha, A JIT lot-splitting model for supply chain management: Enhancing buyer–supplier linkage, Int. J. Production Economics, vol. 86, pp. 1-10, 2003. 2006
E.L.Deci, R. Koestner, R., & R. M. Ryan. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. 1999
A.E. Gottfried,. Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 525–538. 1990
F. Guay, J. Chanal, C.F. Ratelle, H.W. Marsh, S. Larose, & M. Boivin. Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (4), 711–735. 2010
E. Kong. The Potential of Neuro-Linguistic Programming in Human Capital Development. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management. Volume 10 Issue 2 (pp 131-141), avalaible online at www.ejkm.com. 2012
E.R. Lai. Motivation: A Literature Review. Pearson. Research Report. Pearson’s publications retrieved through http://www.pearsonassessments.com/research. 2011
J. Legall, J. Neuro Linguistic Programming: A Personnal Development Tool Applied to the Pedagogy and to the Improvement of Teachers/ Students Relation. Spain: Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Education Technology. Dec 15-16, 2006. 2011
M. Md. Taib,. NLP: Rahsia Sains dan Seni Kejayaan Diri. Kuala Lumpur: MTM Consultants Sdn. Bhd.2009
R. Millrood,. The role of NLP in teacher’s classroom discourse. ELT Journals Volume, 58(1), 28-37. 2004
M. Z. Muhammad Kamil. Minat Dan Motivasi Pelajar Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Islam KBSM: Satu Tinjauan Ke Atas Pelajar-Pelajar Tingkatan 4 Di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Tanjung Adang, Gelang Patah, Johor Bahru, Johor. Tidak diterbitkan. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai. 2001
M Shapiro. Successful Neuro-Linguistic Programming. United Kingdom: Cenveo Publisher Services. 2012
D.J. Stipek. Motivation and instruction. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan. pp. 85–113.1998
J.C.Turner. The influence of classroom contexts on young children’s motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 410–441. 1995
P. Tosey, P, J. Mathison,& D. Michelli, Mapping Transformative Learning: The Potential of Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Journal of Transformative Education, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp 140-167. 2005
J. Walter, & A. Bayat,. Neurolinguistic Programming: verbal communication. British Medical Journal, 326, 7389, S83. 2003
B.Weiner, History Of Motivational Research In Education. Journal Of Educational Psyhology. 82(4), 616-622. 1990
A. Yahaya, A. & A.H. Nurul, Teori-teori Motivasi. Johor: Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 2010

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 42 - 48, 18.04.2015

Sabariah Sharif Emila Abdul Aziz

https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.65269

Cited By: 3

Öz

Kaynakça

Asmawati Desa. Psikologi Untuk Golongan Profesional. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., 2002
B. Badrulzaman, Persekitaran Keluarga dan Kesannya Terhadap Tingkah Laku Devian Remaja di Daerah Pontian, Johor. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Thesis Sarjana. B. 2006.
R.Bailey,.NLP Counselling. Great Britain: Speechmark Publishing Ltd. 2001
A. Bandura,. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. 1997
A. Bashir, A., & M. Ghani,. Effective Communication and Neurolinguistic Programming. Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci. Vol. 6 (1), 216-222. 2012
N. Brown. What makes a good educator? The relevance of meta programmes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(5), 515-533. 2004
J. Carey, R. Churches, R., G. Hutchinson, G., T. Jones, J., P. Tosey, Neuro-linguistic programming and learning: teacher case studies on the impact of NLP in education. United Kingdom: CfBT Education Trust, dibentangkan dalam Education Show Seminar, 6 Mac 2010. 2010
Y.P. Chua, . Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan: Buku 1. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill. S.L. Kim and D. Ha, A JIT lot-splitting model for supply chain management: Enhancing buyer–supplier linkage, Int. J. Production Economics, vol. 86, pp. 1-10, 2003. 2006
E.L.Deci, R. Koestner, R., & R. M. Ryan. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. 1999
A.E. Gottfried,. Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 525–538. 1990
F. Guay, J. Chanal, C.F. Ratelle, H.W. Marsh, S. Larose, & M. Boivin. Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80 (4), 711–735. 2010
E. Kong. The Potential of Neuro-Linguistic Programming in Human Capital Development. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management. Volume 10 Issue 2 (pp 131-141), avalaible online at www.ejkm.com. 2012
E.R. Lai. Motivation: A Literature Review. Pearson. Research Report. Pearson’s publications retrieved through http://www.pearsonassessments.com/research. 2011
J. Legall, J. Neuro Linguistic Programming: A Personnal Development Tool Applied to the Pedagogy and to the Improvement of Teachers/ Students Relation. Spain: Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Education Technology. Dec 15-16, 2006. 2011
M. Md. Taib,. NLP: Rahsia Sains dan Seni Kejayaan Diri. Kuala Lumpur: MTM Consultants Sdn. Bhd.2009
R. Millrood,. The role of NLP in teacher’s classroom discourse. ELT Journals Volume, 58(1), 28-37. 2004
M. Z. Muhammad Kamil. Minat Dan Motivasi Pelajar Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Islam KBSM: Satu Tinjauan Ke Atas Pelajar-Pelajar Tingkatan 4 Di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Tanjung Adang, Gelang Patah, Johor Bahru, Johor. Tidak diterbitkan. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai. 2001
M Shapiro. Successful Neuro-Linguistic Programming. United Kingdom: Cenveo Publisher Services. 2012
D.J. Stipek. Motivation and instruction. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan. pp. 85–113.1998
J.C.Turner. The influence of classroom contexts on young children’s motivation for literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 410–441. 1995
P. Tosey, P, J. Mathison,& D. Michelli, Mapping Transformative Learning: The Potential of Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Journal of Transformative Education, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp 140-167. 2005
J. Walter, & A. Bayat,. Neurolinguistic Programming: verbal communication. British Medical Journal, 326, 7389, S83. 2003
B.Weiner, History Of Motivational Research In Education. Journal Of Educational Psyhology. 82(4), 616-622. 1990
A. Yahaya, A. & A.H. Nurul, Teori-teori Motivasi. Johor: Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 2010

Toplam 24 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil	İngilizce
Bölüm	Makaleler
Yazarlar	Sabariah Sharif Emila Abdul Aziz
Yayımlanma Tarihi	18 Nisan 2015
Gönderilme Tarihi	28 Mart 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2015Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

EndNote	Sharif S, Abdul Aziz E (01 Nisan 2015) Application of Neuro-Linguistic Programming Techniques to Enhance the Motivation of At-Risk Student. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education 1 1 42–48.