Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=YNXj52w6OtyYwmflMFVqataSMjXZNgHNRfVpuv50C8c&_path=id%3D1439635%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Den%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

AN AUTOMATED STUDENT PLAGIARISM MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION – EFFICACY AND ADOPTION CONSIDERATIONS

Year 2024, Volume: 10 Issue: 27 & 28 -Joint Issue, 60 - 74, 03.05.2024

Mohini Grobler

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11002346

Abstract

AN AUTOMATED STUDENT PLAGIARISM MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN
PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION – EFFICACY AND ADOPTION
CONSIDERATIONS
Mohini Grobler
School of Management, Varsity College, Independent Institute of Education, Nelson Mandela Bay,
South Africa
Abstract
The prevalence of student plagiarism poses a formidable challenge to academic integrity. This study
presents incumbent factors and considerations in the implementation of an automated student plagiarism
management system, grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), at a private higher education
institution. The TAM, recognized for its relevance in technology adoption, guides the design and
implementation of the automated system, aiming to discern its impact on academic acceptance. Employing a
mixed-methods approach, the research integrates quantitative analysis of usage statistics from the system
and thematic analysis of open-ended surveys distributed to a purposive sample of academics.
The study spans 2021 to 2023, during which 2139 plagiarism cases were reported and managed by the
automated system, revealing salient patterns. Notably, the codification of policy parameters within the TAM
framework effectively redirects unintentional plagiarism cases towards rehabilitation programs, indicating
nuanced handling of diverse infractions. Penalties for intentional plagiarism serve as deterrents, evidenced
by reduced repeat offenses. This paper demonstrates the usefulness of TAM in transitioning from manual to
automated systems and explores nuances of user support for technological advancements and
administrative automation. Early acceptance levels, with lower subsequent usage, suggest a gradual decline
in adoption of the technology.
The case study presented illuminates critical factors influencing the migration from manual to automated
plagiarism systems, offering insights into the efficacy and adoption of such technology within an institution.
Furthermore, the study aims to contribute to the consolidation of relevant Fourth Industrial Revolution (4-IR)
semantics, weaving together themes of plagiarism, academic integrity, automated education systems, and
the efficacy of technological adoption.
Keywords: Automation, TAM, Student Plagiarism Management, future technology, Administrative Processes

Keywords

Automation TAM Student Plagiarism Management future technology Administrative Processes

Thanks

My wonderful husband and daughter who always support me. My father who reviewed my work and my mother who kept us going.

References

  • Adam, L., Anderson, V., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2017). ‘It’s not fair’: policy discourses and students’ understandings of plagiarism in a New Zealand university. Higher Education, 74, 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-016-0025-9.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Ali, M. (2021). Attitudes towards plagiarism among faculty members in Egypt: a cross-sectional study. Scientometrics, 126, 3535-3547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03872-8.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman. Bennington, A., & Singh, H. (2013). Faculty Expectations of Administration: Predictors of Intention to Report Student Plagiarism. The Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17, 63.
  • Brown, A., & Murphy, D. (1989). Cryptomnesia: Delineating inadvertent plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 432-442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.432.
  • Brown, S., & Hammond, K. (2022). Plagiarism in Higher Education: Navigating a Perfect Storm. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.5.452.
  • Buchanan, T., Sainter, P., & Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9066-6.
  • Doghonadze, N., Pipia, E., & Parjanadze, N. (2018). Institutional Plagiarism Policy (Georgian higher education institutions’ case). Journal of Education in Black Sea Region. https://doi.org/10.31578/JEBS.2018.3.2.10.
  • East, J. (2009). Aligning policy and practice: An approach to integrating academic integrity. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3.
  • Ellery, K. (2008). Undergraduate plagiarism: a pedagogical perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 507 - 516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698918.
  • Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. (2014). Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students' understanding of plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 1202 - 1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777412.
  • Halupa, C., & Bolliger, D. (2015). Student Perceptions of Self-Plagiarism: A Multi-University Exploratory Study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13, 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10805-015-9228-4.
  • Jereb, E., Perc, M., Lämmlein, B., Jerebic, J., Urh, M., Podbregar, I., & Sprajc, P. (2018). Factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: A comparison of German and Slovene students. PLoS ONE, 13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202252.
  • Khathayut, P., & Walker-Gleaves, C. (2020). Academic faculty conceptualisation and understanding of plagiarism – a Thai university exploratory study. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45, 558 - 572. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1795093.
  • Luksanapruksa, P., & Millhouse, P. (2016). Guidelines on What Constitutes Plagiarism and Electronic Tools to Detect it. Clinical Spine Surgery, 29, 119–120. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000371.
  • Moore, D. (1995). Academic integrity. BMJ, 311 7004, 573. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-543-8.ch007.
  • Partap, B., Kumar, R., & Singh, B. (2019). Plagiarism and Fair Use of Copyrighted Work: Awareness Survey among Doctoral Students of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India. Library Progress (International). https://doi.org/10.5958/2320-317X.2019.00009.6.
  • Patil, A., Jadhav, N., Sargar, S., & Jayachandran, S. (2019). Faculty Automation System. Journal of emerging technologies and innovative research.
  • Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., Mavrinac, M., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Attitudes toward plagiarism among pharmacy and medical biochemistry students - cross-sectional survey study. Biochemia Medica, 20, 307-313. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2010.039.
  • Singh, H., & Bennington, A. (2012). Faculty on the Frontline: Predicting Faculty Intentions to Address College Student Plagiarism. The Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 16, 115.
  • Saeed, S., Aamir, R., & Ramzan, M. (2011). Plagiarism and its implications on higher education in developing countries. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 3, 123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2011.039552.
  • Shadiqi, M. (2019). Memahami dan Mencegah Perilaku Plagiarisme dalam Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Bulletin Psikologi. https://doi.org/10.22146/BULETINPSIKOLOGI.43058.
  • Stoffel, M., Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H., 2021. partR2: partitioning R2 in generalized linear mixed models. PeerJ, 9. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11414.
  • Strub, M., & Cieszewski, C. (2012). Generalization of the Coefficient of Determination or R-square and its application to Self-Referencing Models. Math. Comput. For. Nat. Resour. Sci., 4, 73-76.
  • Yorke, J., Lawson, K., & McMahon, G. (2009). Can we reliably determine intent in cases of plagiarism? The International Journal for Educational Integrity, 5, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.21913/IJEI.V5I2.612.
  • Yoshida, H., 2016. Perceived usefulness of" flipped learning" on instructional design for elementary and secondary education: With focus on pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(6), p.430.
  • Zhang, N., & Yi, A. (2021). The Reasons and Countermeasures of Chinese College Students' unintentional Plagiarism. 2021 7th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463531.3463555.

Year 2024, Volume: 10 Issue: 27 & 28 -Joint Issue, 60 - 74, 03.05.2024

Mohini Grobler

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11002346

Abstract

References

  • Adam, L., Anderson, V., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2017). ‘It’s not fair’: policy discourses and students’ understandings of plagiarism in a New Zealand university. Higher Education, 74, 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-016-0025-9.Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Ali, M. (2021). Attitudes towards plagiarism among faculty members in Egypt: a cross-sectional study. Scientometrics, 126, 3535-3547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03872-8.Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman. Bennington, A., & Singh, H. (2013). Faculty Expectations of Administration: Predictors of Intention to Report Student Plagiarism. The Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 17, 63.
  • Brown, A., & Murphy, D. (1989). Cryptomnesia: Delineating inadvertent plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, 432-442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.432.
  • Brown, S., & Hammond, K. (2022). Plagiarism in Higher Education: Navigating a Perfect Storm. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.5.452.
  • Buchanan, T., Sainter, P., & Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9066-6.
  • Doghonadze, N., Pipia, E., & Parjanadze, N. (2018). Institutional Plagiarism Policy (Georgian higher education institutions’ case). Journal of Education in Black Sea Region. https://doi.org/10.31578/JEBS.2018.3.2.10.
  • East, J. (2009). Aligning policy and practice: An approach to integrating academic integrity. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 3.
  • Ellery, K. (2008). Undergraduate plagiarism: a pedagogical perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 507 - 516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701698918.
  • Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. (2014). Who has read the policy on plagiarism? Unpacking students' understanding of plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 39, 1202 - 1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777412.
  • Halupa, C., & Bolliger, D. (2015). Student Perceptions of Self-Plagiarism: A Multi-University Exploratory Study. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13, 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10805-015-9228-4.
  • Jereb, E., Perc, M., Lämmlein, B., Jerebic, J., Urh, M., Podbregar, I., & Sprajc, P. (2018). Factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: A comparison of German and Slovene students. PLoS ONE, 13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202252.
  • Khathayut, P., & Walker-Gleaves, C. (2020). Academic faculty conceptualisation and understanding of plagiarism – a Thai university exploratory study. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45, 558 - 572. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1795093.
  • Luksanapruksa, P., & Millhouse, P. (2016). Guidelines on What Constitutes Plagiarism and Electronic Tools to Detect it. Clinical Spine Surgery, 29, 119–120. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000371.
  • Moore, D. (1995). Academic integrity. BMJ, 311 7004, 573. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-543-8.ch007.
  • Partap, B., Kumar, R., & Singh, B. (2019). Plagiarism and Fair Use of Copyrighted Work: Awareness Survey among Doctoral Students of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India. Library Progress (International). https://doi.org/10.5958/2320-317X.2019.00009.6.
  • Patil, A., Jadhav, N., Sargar, S., & Jayachandran, S. (2019). Faculty Automation System. Journal of emerging technologies and innovative research.
  • Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., Mavrinac, M., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Attitudes toward plagiarism among pharmacy and medical biochemistry students - cross-sectional survey study. Biochemia Medica, 20, 307-313. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2010.039.
  • Singh, H., & Bennington, A. (2012). Faculty on the Frontline: Predicting Faculty Intentions to Address College Student Plagiarism. The Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 16, 115.
  • Saeed, S., Aamir, R., & Ramzan, M. (2011). Plagiarism and its implications on higher education in developing countries. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 3, 123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2011.039552.
  • Shadiqi, M. (2019). Memahami dan Mencegah Perilaku Plagiarisme dalam Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Bulletin Psikologi. https://doi.org/10.22146/BULETINPSIKOLOGI.43058.
  • Stoffel, M., Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H., 2021. partR2: partitioning R2 in generalized linear mixed models. PeerJ, 9. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11414.
  • Strub, M., & Cieszewski, C. (2012). Generalization of the Coefficient of Determination or R-square and its application to Self-Referencing Models. Math. Comput. For. Nat. Resour. Sci., 4, 73-76.
  • Yorke, J., Lawson, K., & McMahon, G. (2009). Can we reliably determine intent in cases of plagiarism? The International Journal for Educational Integrity, 5, 39-46. https://doi.org/10.21913/IJEI.V5I2.612.
  • Yoshida, H., 2016. Perceived usefulness of" flipped learning" on instructional design for elementary and secondary education: With focus on pre-service teacher education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(6), p.430.
  • Zhang, N., & Yi, A. (2021). The Reasons and Countermeasures of Chinese College Students' unintentional Plagiarism. 2021 7th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463531.3463555.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Communication Education
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mohini Grobler

Early Pub Date April 22, 2024
Publication Date May 3, 2024
Submission Date February 19, 2024
Acceptance Date March 20, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 10 Issue: 27 & 28 -Joint Issue

Cite

EndNote Grobler M (May 1, 2024) AN AUTOMATED STUDENT PLAGIARISM MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN PRIVATE HIGHER EDUCATION – EFFICACY AND ADOPTION CONSIDERATIONS. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education 10 27 & 28 -Joint Issue 60–74.
 Download Cover Image

 Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015 - 2025

Contact: ijaedujournal@hotmail.com

Creative Commons License

International E-Journal of Advances in Education by IJAEDU is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://ijaedu.ocerintjournals.org