Self-Evaluation and School Improvement: The Issemod Model to Develop the Quality of School Processes and Outcomes
Abstract
Recent European and North American government policies, implementing new systems of evaluation and accountability, have highlighted the use of performance data to inform judgments about schools and stimulate school improvement. This has led to the implementation of school self-evaluation considered as an effective means to increase school quality and effectiveness. Decentralization of education systems, which is the official policy in many European countries, has evoked increased interest in accountability, responsiveness and self-improvement of schools. This trend has promoted, on the one hand a broadening of educational evaluation methodologies and, on the other, a conceptualization of theoretical approaches and research in the field of school effectiveness and improvement. A viable working definition, also used in this research, is that school self-evaluation concerns a type of educational evaluation that is initiated at school level and, at least partially, controlled by the school itself.
This study presents a self-evaluation model, called the ISSEMod, thought to improve school accountability, applicable in different countries, combining central control managed by public authorities (external control) and the autonomy reserved for schools related to pedagogical, instructional and organizational practices (internal control). Using a sample of 58 Tuscan schools, an empirical and evidence-based model of school self-evaluation focused on a flexible system of areas and indicators to investigate and analyse school quality, is proposed here.
Keywords: self-evaluation, school effectiveness, quality assurance, accountability, learning organizations
Keywords
References
- Akpe, C.S. and Afemikhe, O. A. (1991). School of Self-Evaluation: An Examination of the State of The Art in Nigeria. Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 17, 117-127.
- Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. (1978). Organisational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, Mass: Addison Wesley.
- Barzanò, G. (2002). School self-evaluation: Towards a European dimension. European Journal of Teacher Education, 25(1), 83-100.
- Blok, H., Sleegers, P. and Karsten, S. (2008). Looking for a balance between internal and external evaluation of school quality: Evaluation of the SVI model. Journal of Education Policy, 23(4), 379-395.
- Brookover, W.B. et al. (1979). School Social Systems and Student Achievement: Schools Can Make a Difference. New York: Praeger.
- Carnall, C.A. (1990). Managing Change in Organisations. New York: Prentice Hall.
- Carnoy, M., Elmore, R. and Siskin, L.S. (2003). The New Accountability. High Schools and High Stakes Testing. New York: Routledge.
- Coe, R. (2002). Finding Out What Works: Evidence-based Education. Durham: Durham University Press.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Authors
Davide Capperucci
Publication Date
August 31, 2015
Submission Date
August 28, 2015
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2015 Volume: 1 Number: 2
Cited By
Educational Work in General Secondary Education Institutions: Modern Aspects
Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”
https://doi.org/10.52534/msu-pp.8(1).2022.45-54
