Year 2017, Volume 3 , Issue 8, Pages 329 - 333 2017-08-31


Abdallah Amin TERRİCHE [1]

In their attempt to learn a foreign language, learners make errors. Providing a feedback on this erroneous language output presents a multilevel dilemma. First, teachers must decide whether or not to respond. Second, if feedback is ever desperately required, who should do it and how should it be done? More important, overwhelmed by the sheer number of beginner and intermediate-level learners’ errors, keeping a record and making notes of the important errors during interpersonal conversation such as role plays poses a serious challenge. Equally important, teachers are more inclined to interrupt constantly the flow of learners’ conversation to provide corrective feedback, a practice that much dampens their enthusiasm to express themselves. In response, the current paper addresses two main questions: which teaching technique could teachers devise to organize their corrective feedback provision?  Which technology toolkit could be brought into classroom use to help organize corrective feedback provision to learners’ oral flawed output? The paper draws on the experimental use of audiovisual recordings of learners’ oral output for the purpose of providing more adequate corrective feedback. With one objective in mind, the experiment is aimed to test the utility of using audiovisual recording to improve the quality of corrective feedback provision. Audiovisual recordings provide useful database for teachers to organize any remedial intervention and feedback provision. Moreover, the recordings will, in the long term, constitute a corpus that could be well exploited to build an explanatory theory for learners’ errors.

audiovisual-based corrective feedback, corrective feedback, oral errors feedback
  • Bailey, K. (2005). Practical English Language Teaching. Speaking. New York (NY): McGraw Hill. Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Hill, P., & Pincas, A. (1980). Teaching English as a Foreign Language. New York (NY): Routledge. Cruickshank, D., Jenkins, D. B., & Metcalf, K. K. The Act of Teaching. USA: McGraw-Hill College. Douglass, H. B. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York (NY): Longman. Douglass Brown, H. (2000). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York (NY): Longman. Guillot, M. N. (1999). Fluency and its Teaching. Great Britain: Multilingual Matters. Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon. Littlewood, W. (1998). Foreign and Second Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nation, P. (1989). Improving Speaking Fluency. System, 17 (3), 377-384. Pollard, L. (2008). Lucy Pollard’s Guide to Teaching English. USA. Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rivers, W., & Temperley, M. S. (1978). A Practical Guide to the Teaching of English as a Second or Foreign Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Venkateswaran, S. (1995). Principles of Teaching English. New Delhi: VIKAS Publishing House.
Subjects Social
Journal Section Articles

Author: Abdallah Amin TERRİCHE
Country: Algeria


Publication Date : August 31, 2017

EndNote %0 International E-Journal of Advances in Education WATCH THEIR LANGUAGE: FEEDBACK PROVISION VIA AUDIO-VISUAL RECORDINGS %A Abdallah Amin Terri̇che %T WATCH THEIR LANGUAGE: FEEDBACK PROVISION VIA AUDIO-VISUAL RECORDINGS %D 2017 %J IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education %P 2411-1821-2411-1821 %V 3 %N 8 %R doi: 10.18768/ijaedu.336268 %U 10.18768/ijaedu.336268