BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE FRACTION DIVISION OPERATION SENSE

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4, 32 - 39, 22.04.2016
https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.35993

Öz

This study reports on the development of an instrument to measure fraction division operation sense. Internal content validity of the instrument was established following an extensive item creation and pilot testing. The instrument thereafter was administered to 113 pre-service teachers with an aim to evaluate its internal consistency reliability. Cronbach’s alpha for the total score of instrument was .888. To evaluate test-retest reliability, 59 out of the 113 pre-service teachers used the instrument twice, 14 days apart. Pearson’s correlation for the total score of instrument was .929. These results provide favorable evidence for the reliability of the instrument.

Keywords: Fraction, division, pre-service teachers, internal consistency, test-retest.

Kaynakça

  • Alenazi, A. (2014). Understanding Pre-service Teachers' Self-assessment: The Case of Fraction Division. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Document ID 1564773522).
  • Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal. 90(4): 449-466. Beckmann, S. (2010).
  • Mathematics for Elementary Teachers (3rd ed), Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Clauss, J., & Geedey, K. (2010). Knowledge Surveys: Students Ability to Self-Assess. Journal of the
  • Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10 (2), 14-24.
  • Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Huinker D. (2002). Examining dimensions of fraction operation sense. In B. Litwiller (Ed.) Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers
  • of Mathematics. 72-78.
  • Li Y, Smith D. (2007). Prospective middle school teachers' knowledge in mathematics and pedagogy for teaching - The case of fraction division. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.),
  • Proceedings of the 31st conference of the international group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 3, pp. 185-192. Seoul, The Republic of Korea: PME.
  • Lubinski C, Fox T, Thomason R. (1998). Learning to make sense of division of fractions: One K-8 preservice teacher’s perspective. School Science and Mathematics. 98:247-259.
  • Ma L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Meyers, L.S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A.J. (2013a). Performing data analysis using IBM SPSS. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Nillas, L. (2003). Division of fractions: Preservice teachers’ understanding and use of problem solving
  • strategies. The Mathematics Educator,7(2), 96 – 113.
  • Nuhfer, E., & Knipp, D. (2003). The knowledge survey: A tool for all reasons. To Improve the Academy, 21, 59.
  • Orrill, C., Araujo, Z., & Jacobson, D. (2010). Teachers’ emerging understanding of fractions division as proportional reasoning in professional development. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
  • Petit, M., Laird, R., & Marsden, E. (2010). A focus on fractions. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Simon, M. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers' knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 233-254.
  • Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha,” International Journal of Medical Education, vol. 2, pp. 53–55.
  • Tirosh D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s misconceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 31(1), 5-25.
  • Wirth, K. R., & Perkins, D. (2005). Knowledge surveys: An indispensable course design and assessment tool. Innovations in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Retrieved January 13, 2011: http://www.macalester.edu/geology/wirth/WirthPerkinsKS.pdf
Yıl 2016, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4, 32 - 39, 22.04.2016
https://doi.org/10.18768/ijaedu.35993

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Alenazi, A. (2014). Understanding Pre-service Teachers' Self-assessment: The Case of Fraction Division. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (Document ID 1564773522).
  • Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal. 90(4): 449-466. Beckmann, S. (2010).
  • Mathematics for Elementary Teachers (3rd ed), Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Clauss, J., & Geedey, K. (2010). Knowledge Surveys: Students Ability to Self-Assess. Journal of the
  • Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10 (2), 14-24.
  • Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Huinker D. (2002). Examining dimensions of fraction operation sense. In B. Litwiller (Ed.) Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers
  • of Mathematics. 72-78.
  • Li Y, Smith D. (2007). Prospective middle school teachers' knowledge in mathematics and pedagogy for teaching - The case of fraction division. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.),
  • Proceedings of the 31st conference of the international group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 3, pp. 185-192. Seoul, The Republic of Korea: PME.
  • Lubinski C, Fox T, Thomason R. (1998). Learning to make sense of division of fractions: One K-8 preservice teacher’s perspective. School Science and Mathematics. 98:247-259.
  • Ma L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Meyers, L.S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A.J. (2013a). Performing data analysis using IBM SPSS. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Nillas, L. (2003). Division of fractions: Preservice teachers’ understanding and use of problem solving
  • strategies. The Mathematics Educator,7(2), 96 – 113.
  • Nuhfer, E., & Knipp, D. (2003). The knowledge survey: A tool for all reasons. To Improve the Academy, 21, 59.
  • Orrill, C., Araujo, Z., & Jacobson, D. (2010). Teachers’ emerging understanding of fractions division as proportional reasoning in professional development. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
  • Petit, M., Laird, R., & Marsden, E. (2010). A focus on fractions. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Simon, M. (1993). Prospective elementary teachers' knowledge of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 233-254.
  • Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha,” International Journal of Medical Education, vol. 2, pp. 53–55.
  • Tirosh D. (2000). Enhancing prospective teachers’ knowledge of children’s misconceptions: The case of division of fractions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 31(1), 5-25.
  • Wirth, K. R., & Perkins, D. (2005). Knowledge surveys: An indispensable course design and assessment tool. Innovations in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Retrieved January 13, 2011: http://www.macalester.edu/geology/wirth/WirthPerkinsKS.pdf
Toplam 22 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ali Alenazi

Yayımlanma Tarihi 22 Nisan 2016
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Nisan 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2016Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

EndNote Alenazi A (01 Nisan 2016) DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE FRACTION DIVISION OPERATION SENSE. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education 2 4 32–39.

 Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015 - 2023

Contact: ijaedujournal@hotmail.com

Creative Commons License

International E-Journal of Advances in Education by IJAEDU is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://ijaedu.ocerintjournals.org