A PROPOSED APPROACH TO TRAINING FASHION STUDENTS ON CREATIVITY FACTORS: RIBBONS FASHION TREND AS A MODEL
Öz
The current study aims to propose an approach to train fashion students on creativity factors (originality, fluency, flexibility, sensitivity, and elaboration), the proposed approach have been examined through the study experiment at University of Nizwa, Fall semester 2021/2022, the experiment could be summarized in teaching and designing a ribbon fashion collection, the researcher divided fashion students into two groups, experimental and control, (10) students for each, , the researcher/professor taught the control group the section of (Ribbons Fashion Trend) in conventional methods, presenting definitions and comprehensive analyzing of fashion examples in contrast to the experimental group, the researcher/designer have designed (12) creative ribbons fashion designs on mannequin, presenting adequate analysis how creativity factors enabled the designer/professor to consist an entire collection, then the researcher assigned the two groups (20 students) to sketching ribbons fashion, (5) designs in one sheet for each, the (20) collection sheets had been measured by fashion professors through a Valuing Questionnaire which had been designed by the researcher, the reliability and validity of the questionnaire had been approved, the results proved the hypothesis for the experimental group: Training fashion students on creativity factors throughout an entire designs collection, indicating each factor role (originality, fluency, flexibility, sensitivity, and elaboration) in proposing a creative collection is enhancing creative thinking of the students/designers in proposing their fashion collections.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Fashion designing ribbons fashion trend creativity factors fashion students fashion teaching dyed fashion fabrics manipulation (originality fluency flexibility problem sensitivity and elaboration).
Destekleyen Kurum
University of Nizwa
Teşekkür
University of Nizwa
Kaynakça
- Amabile, T. M. Conti, R. Coon, H. Lazwnby, J. Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Academy of Mangaement Journal. Vol 39, no 5, PP 1154: 1184.
- Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering Creativity in the Classroom: General Principles. In M. A. Runco. The Creativity Research Handbook. Vol 1, Hampton Press, PP 83: 114. Demirkan, H. (2010). From Theory to Practice. In A. Williams, M. J. Ostwald H. H. Askland. Creativity, Design and Education Theories Positions and Challenges. PP 56: 59.
- Demirkan, H. Afacan, Y. (2012). Assessing Creativity in Design Education: Analysis of Creativity Factors in the First-Year Design Studio. Design Studies, no 33, PP 262:278.
- Elton, L. (2006). Assessing Creativity in an Unhelpful Climate. Art, design, and Communication in in Higher Education. Vol 5, no 2, PP119: 130.
- Hassaan, R. R. M. (2020). (Mosaic Motifs Structure): A Proposed Strategy in Teaching Fashion Design Practical Courses. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education. Vol 6, Issue 18, PP 315: 325.
- Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The Consensual Assessment Technique: An examination of the Relationship between Ratings of Product and Process Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, vol 7, no 2, PP176: 192.
- Horn, D. Salvendy, G. (2006). Product Creativity: Conceptual Model, Measurement and Characteristics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol 7, no 4, PP395: 412.
- Horn, D. Salvendy, G. (2009). Measuring Consumer Perception of Product Creativity: Impact of Satisfaction and Purchas ability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing. Vol 19, no 3, PP223: 240.
- Jarwan, F. (2005). Teaching Thinking: Definition and Applications. Amman. Dar-Alfikr. Jordan.
- Kreitler, S. Casakin, H. (2010). Motivation for Creativity: The perspective of Design and Engineering Design Studies. Implications for Design. International Journal for Technology and Design Education. Vol 20, no 4, PP477:493.
- Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fivty Years of CreativityResearch in Strenberg. Handbook of Creativity. Cambraidge University Press. PP 449: 460. Paulus, P. Nijstad, B. (2003). Group Creativity. Oxford University Press. New York.
- Sternberg, R. Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms, In Sternberg, R. Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press. PP 3:31.
- Taleb, A. Hamza, H. Wefky, E. (2013). The Effect of Using Brainstorming Strategy on Developing Creative Thinking Skills for Sixth Grade Students in Science Teaching. 2013 4th International Conference on e-Learning “Best Practice in Management, Design and Development of e-Courses: Standards Excellence and Creativity”. PP 169: 173.
- Toothpicker. (2019). The art of paper: folding, pleating and manipulation. From: https://www.toothpicnations.co.uk/my-blog/?p=38622 (17 August 2021) Williams, M. A. Ostwald, M. Askland, H. H. (2011). Assessing Creativity in Context of Architectureal Design Education. (ALTC) the Australian Learning and Teaching Council. From: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228701713_Assessing_creativity_in_the_context_of_architectural_design_education. (21 October 2021)
- Williams, M. J. Askland, H. Williams, A. (2017). Changing Conceptualisation of Creativity in Design. From: file:///C:/Users/khali/OneDrive/Desktop/Downloads/p4-Askland.pdf (1 January 2022)
- Yamacli, R. Ozen, A. Tokman, L. Y. (2006). An Experimental Study in an Architectural Design Studio: The Search for Three-Dimensional Form and Aesthetics through Clay. The International Journal of Art and Design Education. Vol 24, no 3, PP 308: 314.
Öz
Kaynakça
- Amabile, T. M. Conti, R. Coon, H. Lazwnby, J. Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Academy of Mangaement Journal. Vol 39, no 5, PP 1154: 1184.
- Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering Creativity in the Classroom: General Principles. In M. A. Runco. The Creativity Research Handbook. Vol 1, Hampton Press, PP 83: 114. Demirkan, H. (2010). From Theory to Practice. In A. Williams, M. J. Ostwald H. H. Askland. Creativity, Design and Education Theories Positions and Challenges. PP 56: 59.
- Demirkan, H. Afacan, Y. (2012). Assessing Creativity in Design Education: Analysis of Creativity Factors in the First-Year Design Studio. Design Studies, no 33, PP 262:278.
- Elton, L. (2006). Assessing Creativity in an Unhelpful Climate. Art, design, and Communication in in Higher Education. Vol 5, no 2, PP119: 130.
- Hassaan, R. R. M. (2020). (Mosaic Motifs Structure): A Proposed Strategy in Teaching Fashion Design Practical Courses. IJAEDU- International E-Journal of Advances in Education. Vol 6, Issue 18, PP 315: 325.
- Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The Consensual Assessment Technique: An examination of the Relationship between Ratings of Product and Process Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, vol 7, no 2, PP176: 192.
- Horn, D. Salvendy, G. (2006). Product Creativity: Conceptual Model, Measurement and Characteristics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol 7, no 4, PP395: 412.
- Horn, D. Salvendy, G. (2009). Measuring Consumer Perception of Product Creativity: Impact of Satisfaction and Purchas ability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing. Vol 19, no 3, PP223: 240.
- Jarwan, F. (2005). Teaching Thinking: Definition and Applications. Amman. Dar-Alfikr. Jordan.
- Kreitler, S. Casakin, H. (2010). Motivation for Creativity: The perspective of Design and Engineering Design Studies. Implications for Design. International Journal for Technology and Design Education. Vol 20, no 4, PP477:493.
- Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fivty Years of CreativityResearch in Strenberg. Handbook of Creativity. Cambraidge University Press. PP 449: 460. Paulus, P. Nijstad, B. (2003). Group Creativity. Oxford University Press. New York.
- Sternberg, R. Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms, In Sternberg, R. Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press. PP 3:31.
- Taleb, A. Hamza, H. Wefky, E. (2013). The Effect of Using Brainstorming Strategy on Developing Creative Thinking Skills for Sixth Grade Students in Science Teaching. 2013 4th International Conference on e-Learning “Best Practice in Management, Design and Development of e-Courses: Standards Excellence and Creativity”. PP 169: 173.
- Toothpicker. (2019). The art of paper: folding, pleating and manipulation. From: https://www.toothpicnations.co.uk/my-blog/?p=38622 (17 August 2021) Williams, M. A. Ostwald, M. Askland, H. H. (2011). Assessing Creativity in Context of Architectureal Design Education. (ALTC) the Australian Learning and Teaching Council. From: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228701713_Assessing_creativity_in_the_context_of_architectural_design_education. (21 October 2021)
- Williams, M. J. Askland, H. Williams, A. (2017). Changing Conceptualisation of Creativity in Design. From: file:///C:/Users/khali/OneDrive/Desktop/Downloads/p4-Askland.pdf (1 January 2022)
- Yamacli, R. Ozen, A. Tokman, L. Y. (2006). An Experimental Study in an Architectural Design Studio: The Search for Three-Dimensional Form and Aesthetics through Clay. The International Journal of Art and Design Education. Vol 24, no 3, PP 308: 314.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Alan Eğitimleri |
| Bölüm | Makaleler |
| Yazarlar | |
| Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 4 Mayıs 2022 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 4 Mayıs 2022 |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 11 Şubat 2022 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2022Cilt: 8 Sayı: 22 |
Published and Sponsored by OCERINT International © 2015 - 2023
Contact: ijaedujournal@hotmail.com
International E-Journal of Advances in Education by IJAEDU is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://ijaedu.ocerintjournals.org